VII. Vom objektiven Maßstab zum subjektiven Urteil

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Kanonistische Abteilung
Main Author: Schmoeckel, Mathias (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2023
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/zrgk-2023-0007
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 OLC2143428456
003 DE-627
005 20230813190520.0
007 tu
008 230813s2023 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1515/zrgk-2023-0007  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)OLC2143428456 
035 |a (DE-B1597)zrgk-2023-0007-p 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
082 0 4 |a 340  |a 230  |q VZ 
082 0 4 |a 340  |q VZ 
084 |a 2  |2 ssgn 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
084 |a INTRECHT  |q DE-1a  |2 fid 
100 1 |a Schmoeckel, Mathias  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a VII. Vom objektiven Maßstab zum subjektiven Urteil 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a © 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston 
520 |a Abstract From an objective scale to a subjective verdict. The Role of the Judge in the work of Johann Oldendorp and the re-evaluation of the roman-canon law of evidence in Humanism and Protestant Reformation. The roman-canon law of procedure was based on the assumptions of the Church fathers that laws on jurisdiction would guarantee objective and just decisions. Humanism, however, relied on the assumption that education and knowledge would teach the individual; not general rules, but expertise would lead to cognition and justice. In order to save the traditional law of procedure, Johann Oldendorp, one of the most innovative Protestant lawyers, taught that the best educated judge with sufficient practical experience should still keep the promise of objective, just decisions. Although the ideas on hermeneutics had changed profoundly by then, this reasoning helped to find convincing verdicts in the procedure of the old roman-canon law. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Kanonistische Abteilung  |d De Gruyter, 1911  |g 109(2023), 1 vom: 27. Juni, Seite 198-226  |w (DE-627)129458112  |w (DE-600)200176-7  |w (DE-576)018091229  |x 0323-4142  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:109  |g year:2023  |g number:1  |g day:27  |g month:06  |g pages:198-226 
856 4 1 |u https://doi.org/10.1515/zrgk-2023-0007  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_OLC 
912 |a FID-INTRECHT 
912 |a SSG-OLC-JUR 
912 |a SSG-OLC-HIS 
912 |a SSG-OPC-ANG 
912 |a GBV_ILN_11 
912 |a GBV_ILN_14 
912 |a GBV_ILN_21 
912 |a GBV_ILN_22 
912 |a GBV_ILN_24 
912 |a GBV_ILN_40 
912 |a GBV_ILN_50 
912 |a GBV_ILN_61 
912 |a GBV_ILN_65 
912 |a GBV_ILN_92 
912 |a GBV_ILN_121 
912 |a GBV_ILN_217 
912 |a GBV_ILN_227 
912 |a GBV_ILN_267 
912 |a GBV_ILN_665 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2002 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2004 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2005 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2007 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2008 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2009 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2012 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2033 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2036 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2062 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2508 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4012 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4028 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4112 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4125 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4305 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4306 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4310 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4311 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4318 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4321 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4323 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4385 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 109  |j 2023  |e 1  |b 27  |c 06  |h 198-226