LEADER 01000caa a2200265 4500
001 OLC1970884711
003 DE-627
005 20220215181403.0
007 tu
008 160212s2016 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1108/JES-01-2015-0013  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a PQ20160212 
035 |a (DE-627)OLC1970884711 
035 |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1970884711 
035 |a (PRQ)e1212-4be0746ada2a6ebeec797bae58810eb2c739fd48fe11ab40460867838aa833a40 
035 |a (KEY)0081858520160000043000100070tradeopennessandstructuralvulnerabilityindevelopin 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
082 0 4 |a 300  |a 330  |q DNB 
084 |a 83.00  |2 bkl 
100 1 |a Gnangnon, Sena Kimm  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Trade openness and structural vulnerability in developing countries 
264 1 |c 2016 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate how trade openness affects the structural vulnerability of developing countries. The analysis is conducted on both the entire sample of 105 countries as well as two sub-samples, namely least developed countries (LDCs) and non-LDCs. Design/methodology/approach – To perform the analysis, the author employs fixed-effects (within) regressions supplemented by instrumental variables technique based on the two-step generalized methods of moments approach. Findings – The author finds empirical evidence that although trade policy liberalization reduces the structural vulnerability on the entire sample developing countries, no statistically significant effect of such liberalization is obtained either on LDCs or non-LDCs. However, trade policy liberalization appears to reduce countries’ exposure to shocks, result that applies to the entire sample as well as the two sub-samples. The author also observes that trade policy liberalization exerts no (statistically) significant effect on the size of shocks that affect developing countries, result that applies to both the full sample and the sub-samples of LDCs and non-LDCs. Research limitations/implications – In the absence of a well-established theoretical framework on how trade openness affects the structural vulnerability of developing, the author adopts a pragmatic approach by drawing upon many insights of Loayza and Raddatz (2007) who study the structural determinants of external vulnerability. Practical implications – Developing countries in general and LDCs in particular could address their structural weaknesses by making optimal use of their trade policies. In particular, they could better use the flexibilities available to them in provisions of the World Trade Organization (WTO)’ Agreements. In this respect, the international community, notably donors of the developed world has a key role to play. Originality/value – This is the first study exploring how trade openness, capturing here through trade policy liberalization affects the structural vulnerability of developing countries. 
540 |a Nutzungsrecht: © Emerald Group Publishing Limited 
650 4 |a Mathematical/quantitative economics 
650 4 |a Economics 
650 4 |a Liberalism 
650 4 |a International trade 
650 4 |a Developing countries 
650 4 |a Trade policy 
650 4 |a Economic aspects 
650 4 |a Analysis 
650 4 |a Economic indicators 
650 4 |a Gross Domestic Product--GDP 
650 4 |a Liberalization 
650 4 |a Economic models 
650 4 |a Economic crisis 
650 4 |a Economic policy 
650 4 |a Macroeconomics 
650 4 |a Studies 
650 4 |a Economic growth 
650 4 |a Developing countries--LDCs 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of economic studies  |d Bradford : Emerald, 1965  |g 43(2016), 1, Seite 70-89  |w (DE-627)129312193  |w (DE-600)127399-1  |w (DE-576)014524767  |x 0144-3585  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:43  |g year:2016  |g number:1  |g pages:70-89 
856 4 1 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JES-01-2015-0013  |3 Volltext 
856 4 2 |u http://search.proquest.com/docview/1750405392 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_OLC 
912 |a SSG-OLC-WIW 
912 |a SSG-OLC-IBL 
912 |a GBV_ILN_26 
936 b k |a 83.00  |q AVZ 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 43  |j 2016  |e 1  |h 70-89