Latin Literature
Saved in:
| Published in: | Greece & Rome |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: | 2015 |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S001738351400028X http://search.proquest.com/docview/1672108692 |
| LEADER | 01000caa a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OLC1968367594 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220215084040.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S001738351400028X |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a PQ20160617 |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)OLC1968367594 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1968367594 | ||
| 035 | |a (PRQ)c1529-320d6ea8a8afcdab02d0b5a8b3465672b725db3c91bd6937f1d75b2dce4d7ec40 | ||
| 035 | |a (KEY)0122285620150000062000100097latinliterature | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 930 |a 700 |q DNB |
| 084 | |a 15.25 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 18.40 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 17.70 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 0 | |a Rebecca Langlands |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Latin Literature |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This time last year my review concluded with the observation that the future for the study of Latin literature is fundamentally interdisciplinary, and that we should proceed in close dialogue with social historians and art historians. In the intervening period, two books from a new generation of scholars have been published which remind us of the existence of an alternative tide that is pushing back against such culturally embedded criticism, and urging us to turn anew towards the aesthetic. The very titles of these works, with their references to 'The Sublime' and 'Poetic Autonomy' are redolent of an earlier age in their grandeur and abstraction, and in their confident trans-historicism. Both monographs, in different ways, are seeking to find a new means of grounding literary criticism in reaction to the disempowerment and relativism which is perceived to be the legacy of postmodernism. In their introductions, both bring back to centre stage theoretical controversies that were a prominent feature of scholarship in the 1980s and 1990s (their dynamics acutely observed by Don Fowler in his own Greece & Rome subject reviews of the period) but which have largely faded into the background; the new generation of Latinists tend to have absorbed insights of New Historicism and postmodernism without feeling the need either to defend their importance or to reflect upon their limitations. Henry Day, in his study of the sublime in Lucan's Bellum civile, explicitly responds to the challenges issued by Charles Martindale, who has, of course, continued (in his own words) to wage 'war against the determination of classicists to ground their discipline in "history"'. Day answers Martindale's call for the development of some new form of aesthetic criticism, where hermeneutics and the search for meaning are replaced with (or, better, complemented by) experiential analysis; his way forward is to modify Martindale's pure aesthetics, since he expresses doubt that beauty can be wholly free of ideology, or that aesthetics can be entirely liberated from history, context, and politics. Reassuringly (for the novices among us), Day begins by admitting that the question 'What is the sublime?' is a 'perplexing' one, and he starts with the definition of it as 'a particular kind of subjective experience...in which we encounter an object that exceeds our everyday categories of comprehension' (30). What do they have in common, then, the versions of the sublime, ancient and modern, outlined in Chapter 1: the revelatory knowledge afforded to Lucretius through his grasp of atomism, the transcendent power of great literature for Longinus, and the powerful emotion engendered in the Romantics by the sight of impressive natural phenomena such as a mountain range or a thunderstorm? One of the key ideas to emerge from this discussion - crucial to the rest of the book - is that the sublime is fundamentally about power, and especially the transference of power from the object of contemplation to its subject. The sublime is associated with violence, trauma, and subjugation, as it rips away from us the ground on which we thought we stood; yet it does not need to be complicit with the forces of oppression but can also work for resistance and retaliation. This dynamic of competing sublimes of subjugation and liberation will then help us, throughout the following chapters, to transcend the nihilism/engagement dichotomy that has polarized scholarship on Lucan in recent decades. In turn, Lucan's deployment of the sublime uses it to collapse the opposition between liberation and oppression, and thus the Bellum civile makes its own contribution to the history of the sublime. This is an impressive monograph, much more productively engaged with the details of Lucan's poem than this summary is able to convey; it brought me to a new appreciation of the concept of the sublime, and a new sense of excitement about Lucan's epic poem and its place in the Western tradition. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Books | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Book reviews | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Literary criticism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Roman civilization | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Greece & Rome |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ., 1931 |g 62(2015), 1, Seite 97-106 |w (DE-627)129073180 |w (DE-600)2309-7 |w (DE-576)014405369 |x 0017-3835 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:62 |g year:2015 |g number:1 |g pages:97-106 |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S001738351400028X |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u http://search.proquest.com/docview/1672108692 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_OLC | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-HIS | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-ALT | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-ANG | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_21 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2007 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4027 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4028 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4035 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4082 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 15.25 |q AVZ |
| 936 | b | k | |a 18.40 |q AVZ |
| 936 | b | k | |a 17.70 |q AVZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 62 |j 2015 |e 1 |h 97-106 | ||