Securing through the failure to secure? The ambiguity of resilience at the bombsite

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Security dialogue
Main Author: Heath-Kelly, Charlotte (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0967010614552546
LEADER 01000caa a2200265 4500
001 OLC1962673790
003 DE-627
005 20230714155953.0
007 tu
008 160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/0967010614552546  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a PQ20160617 
035 |a (DE-627)OLC1962673790 
035 |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1962673790 
035 |a (PRQ)c1965-95a9e1ff326d6828cf5887b823222741d3bf494b5376a940ee6ba0921d3f721d0 
035 |a (KEY)0007153620150000046000100069securingthroughthefailuretosecuretheambiguityofres 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
082 0 4 |a 320  |q DNB 
100 1 |a Heath-Kelly, Charlotte  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Securing through the failure to secure? The ambiguity of resilience at the bombsite 
264 1 |c 2015 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Resilience discourses resignify uncertainty and insecurity as the means to attain security. Security failure is resignified as productive and becomes part of the story about security learning and improvements in anticipatory capability. In this article, I explore questions of failure mediation and ‘securing through insecurity’. If resilience policies suggest that failure and insecurity can be mediated and redeployed in the cause of success, what becomes of visceral sites of security failure such as the terrorist bombsite? This article focuses on a site where security agencies failed to prevent the bombing of a packed nightclub in Bali, in order to explore ambiguity of failure in the resilience era. It considers the efforts of politicians and activists to perform the site as resilient, and the spatial and temporal excess which eludes this performance. The article contributes to critical literatures on resilience by showing, through the ambiguities of resilience at the bombsite, that resilience is a chimera with regards to its supposed incorporation of insecurity. 
650 4 |a insecurity 
650 4 |a critical theory 
650 4 |a security 
650 4 |a violence 
650 4 |a terror 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Security dialogue  |d London : Sage Publ., 1992  |g 46(2015), 1, Seite 69-85  |w (DE-627)170917533  |w (DE-600)1126868-2  |w (DE-576)032749805  |x 0967-0106  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:46  |g year:2015  |g number:1  |g pages:69-85 
856 4 1 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0967010614552546  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_OLC 
912 |a SSG-OLC-POL 
912 |a SSG-OLC-IBL 
912 |a GBV_ILN_11 
912 |a GBV_ILN_21 
912 |a GBV_ILN_22 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2024 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2470 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4012 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4311 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4318 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 46  |j 2015  |e 1  |h 69-85