Constructing resilience through security and surveillance: The politics, practices and tensions of security-driven resilience

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Security dialogue
Main Author: Coaffee, Jon (Author)
Other Authors: Fussey, Pete (Other)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0967010614557884
LEADER 01000caa a2200265 4500
001 OLC1962673774
003 DE-627
005 20230714155953.0
007 tu
008 160206s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/0967010614557884  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a PQ20160617 
035 |a (DE-627)OLC1962673774 
035 |a (DE-599)GBVOLC1962673774 
035 |a (PRQ)c1966-36ec54ded16d247fe02230b075ed759e93870aec1438d9833e0d623f54afa1a60 
035 |a (KEY)0007153620150000046000100086constructingresiliencethroughsecurityandsurveillan 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
082 0 4 |a 320  |q DNB 
100 1 |a Coaffee, Jon  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Constructing resilience through security and surveillance: The politics, practices and tensions of security-driven resilience 
264 1 |c 2015 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This article illuminates how, since 9/11, security policy has gradually become more central to a range of resilience discourses and practices. As this process draws a wider range of security infrastructures, organizations and approaches into the enactment of resilience, security practices are enabled through more palatable and legitimizing discourses of resilience. This article charts the emergence and proliferation of security-driven resilience logics, deployed at different spatial scales, which exist in tension with each other. We exemplify such tensions in practice through a detailed case study from Birmingham, UK: ‘Project Champion’ an attempt to install over 200 high-resolution surveillance cameras, often invisibly, around neighbourhoods with a predominantly Muslim population. Here, practices of security-driven resilience came into conflict with other policy priorities focused upon community-centred social cohesion, posing a series of questions about social control, surveillance and the ability of national agencies to construct community resilience in local areas amidst state attempts to label the same spaces as ‘dangerous’. It is argued that security-driven logics of resilience generate conflicts in how resilience is operationalized, and produce and reproduce new hierarchical arrangements which, in turn, may work to subvert some of the founding aspirations and principles of resilience logic itself. 
650 4 |a resilience 
650 4 |a security 
650 4 |a human security 
650 4 |a surveillance 
650 4 |a terror 
700 1 |a Fussey, Pete  |4 oth 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Security dialogue  |d London : Sage Publ., 1992  |g 46(2015), 1, Seite 86-105  |w (DE-627)170917533  |w (DE-600)1126868-2  |w (DE-576)032749805  |x 0967-0106  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:46  |g year:2015  |g number:1  |g pages:86-105 
856 4 1 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0967010614557884  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_OLC 
912 |a SSG-OLC-POL 
912 |a SSG-OLC-IBL 
912 |a GBV_ILN_11 
912 |a GBV_ILN_21 
912 |a GBV_ILN_22 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2024 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2470 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4012 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4311 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4318 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 46  |j 2015  |e 1  |h 86-105